linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] [lkp] [PATCH v3 2/6] atomics: Add test for atomic operations with

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151013013305.GC1009@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:33:27 +0800
From:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
To:	Fengguang Wu <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:	kbuild-all@...org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] [lkp] [PATCH v3 2/6] atomics: Add test for atomic
 operations with _relaxed variants

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:02:00AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:42:24PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > Hi Fengguang,
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:29:14PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> > > Hi Boqun,
> > > 
> > > The base tree detection is based on the whole patchset's
> > > 
> > > - subjects
> > > - touched files
> > > - TO/CC list
> > > 
> > > Log shows the files and TO/CC are strongly related to powerpc,
> > > so it looks a natural choice to apply to it. Especially you put
> > > "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" in the TO list while Peter/Ingo
> > > in the CC list -- that looks like a strong indication for powerpc.
> > > 
> > 
> > Thank you for your explanation, so how about modifying the title to:
> > 
> > [PATCH v3 tip/locking/core 2/6] ...
> > 
> > also works?
> 
> Yes it will work -- that'd be the most strong hint.
> 

Great! I will use that hint in the future, thank you ;-)

> > BTW, does this bot have more tests than 0day? I have pushed this
> > patchset to my own repo and had it tested by 0day.
> 
> Yes, it runs git am, the resulted commits are feed to 0day for
> build/boot/performance tests. If you've already pushed the patches via
> git, the robot should have skip such duplicate tests on the emailed
> patches -- unless there is a bug. I'll have a check.
> 

Thank you, so I'm not going to resend this v3 patchset, will use the
subject hint for any future patchset ;-)

Regards,
Boqun


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)