[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013122713.GS3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:27:13 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] atomics: powerpc: Implement
relaxed/acquire/release variants of some atomics
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:14:00PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> The patchset consists of 6 parts:
>
> 1. Make xchg, cmpxchg and their atomic_ versions a full barrier
>
> 2. Add trivial tests for the new variants in lib/atomic64_test.c
>
> 3. Allow architectures to define their own __atomic_op_*() helpers
> to build other variants based on relaxed.
>
> 4. Implement atomic{,64}_{add,sub,inc,dec}_return_* variants
>
> 5. Implement xchg_* and atomic{,64}_xchg_* variants
>
> 6. Implement cmpxchg_* atomic{,64}_cmpxchg_* variants
>
>
> This patchset is based on current locking/core branch of the tip tree
> and all patches are built and boot tested for little endian pseries, and
> also tested by 0day.
>
I don't see any immediate problems with this series at this point. Will,
Paul?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists