[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561D1885.9050708@imgtec.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:43:17 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jason@...edaemon.net>,
<marc.zyngier@....com>, <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
<ralf@...ux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 09/14] MIPS: add support for generic SMP IPI
support
On 10/13/2015 02:48 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Qais Yousef wrote:
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_IPI
>> +void generic_smp_send_ipi_single(int cpu, unsigned int action)
> Please use a mips name space. This suggests that it s completely
> generic, which is not true.
>
>> +{
>> + generic_smp_send_ipi_mask(cpumask_of(cpu), action);
>> +}
>> +
>> +void generic_smp_send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int action)
> Ditto.
OK.
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + unsigned int core;
>> + int cpu;
>> + struct ipi_mask ipi_mask;
>> +
>> + ipi_mask.cpumask = ((struct cpumask *)mask)->bits;
> We have accessors for that. Hmm, so for this case we must make the
> ipi_mask different:
>
> struct ipi_mask {
> unsigned int nbits;
> bool global;
> union {
> struct cpumask *mask;
> unsigned long cpu_bitmap[];
> };
> };
>
Right. This looks cleaner for sure. Not sure why I haven't though about
this.
Thanks,
Qais
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists