[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013163326.GE24353@leverpostej>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:33:26 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Martin Kepplinger <martink@...teo.de>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, galak@...eaurora.org,
jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de,
pmeerw@...erw.net, mfuzzey@...keon.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@...obroma-systems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: mma8452: support either of the available interrupt
pins
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 05:58:28PM +0200, Martin Kepplinger wrote:
> This change is important in order for everyone to be easily able to use the
> driver for one of the supported accelerometer chips!
>
> Until now, the driver blindly assumed that the INT1 interrupt line is wired
> on a user's board. But these devices have 2 interrupt lines and can route
> their different interrupt sources to one of them. Since only their motion
> detection interrupt source is implemented as IIO events, users just use
> either one of the pins.
>
> client->irq is not changed because only one interrupt line is supported.
> The user is warned if she describes both interrupt pins in the dts.
If the hardware has both wired up, the DT should describe both.
The fact that a kernel might only use one is irrelevant to the binding.
You need to handle the case that both are wired up.
[...]
> + - interrupt-names: should contain "INT1" or "INT2", the accelerometer's
> + interrupt line in use.
This "or" should be "and/or".
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> index 1eccc2d..dbfd0b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/mma8452.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/iio/events.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
>
> #define MMA8452_STATUS 0x00
> #define MMA8452_STATUS_DRDY (BIT(2) | BIT(1) | BIT(0))
> @@ -1130,13 +1131,26 @@ static int mma8452_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> MMA8452_INT_FF_MT;
> int enabled_interrupts = MMA8452_INT_TRANS |
> MMA8452_INT_FF_MT;
> + int irq1, irq2;
>
> - /* Assume wired to INT1 pin */
> - ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(client,
> - MMA8452_CTRL_REG5,
> - supported_interrupts);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + irq1 = of_irq_get_byname(client->dev.of_node, "INT1");
> + irq2 = of_irq_get_byname(client->dev.of_node, "INT2");
> +
> + if (irq1 > 0 && irq2 > 0)
> + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> + "only one interrupt line supported\n");
dev_info(&client->dev, "INT1 and INT2 present.");
This is a valid case, and does not require a warning.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists