lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:58:15 -0700 From: Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com> To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, "Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk> CC: <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: Add new boards to bcm4708 DT bindings Hi Jon, One question below. On 15-10-10 07:42 AM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > On 10/03/2015 12:22 AM, Jon Mason wrote: >> Add the 4708, 4709, and 953012k SVKs to the the documentation for the >> Broadcom Northstar device tree bindings. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt >> index 6b0f49f..bdf4c06 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt > > What should be documented in this file? This is more a question to the > guys more familiar with arm in Linux. Currently the Linux kernel only > supports brcm,bcm4708 and all goes back to that one. > >> @@ -5,4 +5,11 @@ Boards with the BCM4708 SoC shall have the following properties: >> >> Required root node property: >> >> +bcm94709 >> compatible = "brcm,bcm4708"; >> + >> +bcm94709 >> +compatible = "brcm,bcm4709", "brcm,bcm4708"; >> + >> +bcm953012k >> +compatible = "brcm,bcm5301k", "brcm,bcm4708"; Why are you adding a "k" on the string here? bcm5301k is not an SoC part number? >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists