[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1510132113470.25029@nanos>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:15:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
cc: "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
john.stultz@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.b.stanton@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > You are restricting the problem space to this particular use
> > case. There are other use cases where PTP is not available or not the
> > relevant reference, but you still want to correlate time domains to
> > ART.
>
> They may well be other use cases, but they have not been identified
> here. The PTP to media clock problem has a very simple solution. You
> do not need a history of system time stamps to solve it.
Well, these use cases are not in the focus of Christopher, but I have
a few in my head. Think industrial fieldbusses.
> Even if you wanted to correlate the system time's UTC with the media
> clock, still you don't need any shadow history for that. Just feed
> (ART, UTC) pairs into the DSP at a regular rate, and let the DSP do
> the math. This does not need to be part of the central time keeping
> code at all.
That's not working. The firmware is not going to change, no matter
what.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists