linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Basic trusted keys support for TPM 2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151013192547.GA3669@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:25:47 +0300
From:	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
Cc:	tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	peterhuewe@....de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	"open list:KEYS-TRUSTED" <keyrings@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KEYS-TRUSTED" <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Basic trusted keys support for TPM 2.0

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:41:20AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:11:21AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 
> > * I updated tpm_buf to a be heap based structure. Now there's one full
> >   page of memory for variable sized messages. Also the stack is greatly
> >   reduced.
> 
> You may as well just use a skb then.

struct sk_buff??

I think the structure that I've implemented is a good fit. It's simple
to use and does exactly what we need. Can you elaborate what's the
problem with tpm_buf?

> Jason

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/