[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013202748.GD17155@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 22:27:48 +0200
From: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
To: atull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nsource.altera.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, delicious.quinoa@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: socfpga: dts: add fpga manager
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:46:15PM +0200, atull wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Alan!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 01:28:20PM -0500, atull@...nsource.altera.com wrote:
> > > > From: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> > > >
> > > > Add FPGA manager to device tree for SoCFPGA.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@...nsource.altera.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > > index 314e589..e37ba11 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/socfpga.dtsi
> > > > @@ -834,5 +834,12 @@
> > > > compatible = "altr,sys-mgr", "syscon";
> > > > reg = <0xffd08000 0x4000>;
> > > > };
> > > > +
> > > > + hps_0_fpgamgr: fpgamgr@...f706000 {
> > > > + compatible = "altr,socfpga-fpga-mgr";
> > > > + reg = <0xFF706000 0x1000
> > > > + 0xFFB90000 0x1000>;
> > > > + interrupts = <0 175 4>;
> > > > + };
> > > > };
> > > > };
> > >
> > > Please keep the format in line with the rest of the file:
> > > Hexvalues are lowercase and no 0x after the "fpgamgr@".
> > > I'd say "And please put the node in its proper position
> > > according to its address", but I see just now, that the
> > > dtsi is all messed up right now anyway :-(
> > >
>
> "all messed up" seems kind of unclear and overstated here. From the
> context, I assume you mean that you are pointing out that the nodes
> are in more or less alphatetical order and not in order of address. Is
> that what you mean or is the dtsi really all messed up?
>
"more or less" was the thing that bugged me.
And for the record: I didn't try to blame anyone for this. I put
many of the nodes there myself ;-)
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists