[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5204456.Kxa6kNhPYW@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:00:31 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: iproc: fix 32-bit build error
On Tuesday 13 October 2015 13:11:34 Ray Jui wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> >> index f3481ddff344..abcb4be2ee19 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-iproc.c
> >> @@ -235,12 +235,13 @@ static void iproc_pcie_enable(struct iproc_pcie *pcie)
> >> *
> >> * axi_addr -> iproc_pcie_address -> OARR -> OMAP -> pci_address
> >> */
> >> -static int iproc_pcie_setup_ob(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, u64 axi_addr,
> >> +int iproc_pcie_setup_ob(struct iproc_pcie *pcie, u64 axi_addr,
> >
> > Why are you removing the static here?
> >
>
> Yeah we should keep this function as static. The rest of this change
> looks good!
>
Sorry, this accidentally ended up in the patch when I marked the
function as global to track down how the division got called.
I'll send a new version.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists