[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151013213125.GA16200@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:31:27 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support
On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 09:50:12PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Fenghua,
>
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Fenghua Yu wrote:
>
> +Cc: Marcelo
>
> > This series has some preparatory patches and Intel cache allocation
> > support.
>
> <snip>
>
> > Changes in v15:
> > - Add a global IPI to update the closid on CPUs for current tasks.
> > - Other minor changes where I remove the updating of clos_cbm_table to be
> > set to all 1s during init.
> > - Fix a few compilation warnings.
> > - Port the patches to 4.3-rc.
>
> What's the state of the interface discussion? I have not yet seen any
> agreement on that, unless I missed the important mail.
>
> Aside of that, the patches miss a proper
>
> From: Vikas ...
>
> in the patch body at least for those which are untouched by you.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
There are a number of problems with the patches as discussed in the
thread.
I am rewriting the interface with ioctls, with commands similar to the
syscall interface proposed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists