[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014082050.GQ17308@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:20:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mutex: make mutex_lock_nested an inline function
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:30:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > The second argument of the mutex_lock_nested() helper is only
> > > evaluated if CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set. Otherwise we
> > > get this build warning for the new regulator_lock_supply
> > > function:
> > >
> > > drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_lock_supply':
> > > drivers/regulator/core.c:142:6: warning: unused variable 'i' [-Wunused-variable]
> > >
> > > To avoid the warning, this patch changes the definition of
> > > mutex_lock_nested() to be static inline function rather than
> > > a macro, which tells gcc that the variable is potentially
> > > used.
Uuh, I just looked at next and saw this regulator_lock_supply()
function. How is that limited? subclass must be <8 otherwise bad things
happen.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists