[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014084328.GU10641@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:43:28 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, yinghai@...nel.org, dyoung@...hat.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, bp@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jerry_hoemann@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not reserve crashkernel high memory if crashkernel
low memory reserving failed
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:24:51AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> People reported that when allocating crashkernel memory using
> ",high" and ",low" syntax, there were cases where the reservation
> of the "high" portion succeeds, but the reservation of the "low"
> portion fails. Then kexec can load kdump kernel successfully, but
> the boot of kdump kernel fails as there's no low memory. This is
> because allocation of low memory for kdump kernel can fail on large
> systems for reasons. E.g it could be manually specified crashkernel
> low memory is too large to find in memblock region.
>
> In this patch add return value for reserve_crashkernel_low. Then
> try to reserve crashkernel low memory after crashkernel high memory
> has been allocated. If crashkernel low memory reservation failed
> free crashkernel high memory and return. User can take measures
> when they found kdump kernel cann't be loaded successfully.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> Boris commented that error value EINVAL is negative, should
> use "return -EINVAL".
>
> v2->v3:
> Yinghai pointed out that during memblock_reserve, we could double
> the memblock reserve array. New memblock reserve could be overlapped
> with range for crashkernel high. So we have to reserve crashkernel
> high firstly, then free it if crashkernel low memory allocation
> failed.
>
> v3->v4:
> Dave suggested using "return -ENOMEM" when low memory reservation
> failed and printing failure message anyway.
>
> v4->v5:
> Andrew suggested changing the content of failure message and taking
> higher severity KERN_ERR.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
The patch is also in SLES for some time now and was successfully tested
there.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists