[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOAejn1hG34-d=Eq0SUDoay=B04sqoSNnxL++djBDrzdT0f61w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:54:35 +0200
From: "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
pawel.moll@....com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
linux@....linux.org.uk, vinod.koul@...el.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "M'boumba Cedric Madianga" <cedric.madianga@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: Document the STM32 DMA bindings
Hi Mark,
> +5. A 32bit mask specifying the DMA FIFO configuration
> + -bit 0-1: Fifo threshold
> + 0x0: 1/4 full FIFO
> + 0x1: 1/2 full FIFO
> + 0x2: 3/4 full FIFO
> + 0x3:full FIFO
> + -bit 2: Direct mode
> + 0x0: enabled
> + 0x1: disabled
> +
Finally, I find a way to handle the above inputs outside DT.
So, I will remove it from DT in the next version.
Thanks.
To sum-up, the remaining information that the client will have to
specify from DT are describing below.
Is it ok ?
> + -bit 9: Peripheral Increment Address
> + 0x0: no address increment between transfers
> + 0x1: increment address between transfers
> + -bit 10: Memory Increment Address
> + 0x0: no address increment between transfers
> + 0x1: increment address between transfers
> + -bit 15: Peripheral Increment Offset Size
> + 0x0: offset size is linked to the peripheral bus width
> + 0x1: offset size is fixed to 4 (32-bit alignment)
> + -bit 16-17: Priority level
> + 0x0: low
> + 0x1: medium
> + 0x2: high
> + 0x3: very high
BR,
Cedric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists