[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014092923.GA23870@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:29:23 +0200
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Christopher S. Hall" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
john.stultz@...aro.org, peterz@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.b.stanton@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] Produce system time from correlated clocksource
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:21:42AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The firmware gives you an ART/audio timestamp pair. The firmware does
> neither know about system time nor about PTP time.
>
> So we have to do correlation in software.
Ok, so give me the ART/audio and two recent ART/ptp times* spaced one
second apart, then I'll tell you audio/ptp with error well under 1 PPM.
No need to change the firmware.
Who cares about the system time? If the DSP isn't using it, then just
leave it out of the equation.
Thanks,
Richard
* If the audio clock isn't locked to the ART, then I'll need two samples.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists