linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Disable memcpy operation due to performance drop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFd313z+t2rNFZPfXDm952RhAQgZ-_Rdn7P06UyKXcMi0zR47A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:50:33 +0530
From:	Rameshwar Sahu <rsahu@....com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	dan.j.williams@...el.com, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	jcm@...hat.com, patches@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: xgene-dma: Disable memcpy operation due to
 performance drop

Hi Vinod,

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:08:32PM +0530, Rameshwar Sahu wrote:
>> Hi Vinod,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:42 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 02:36:57PM +0530, Rameshwar Prasad Sahu wrote:
>> >> The DMA engine supports memory copy, RAID5 XOR, RAID6 PQ, and other
>> >> computations. But the bandwidth of the entire DMA engine is shared
>> >> among all channels. This patch re-configures operations availability
>> >> such that one can achieve maximum performance for XOR and PQ
>> >> computation by removing the memory offload operations.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Rameshwar Prasad Sahu <rsahu@....com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c | 1 -
>> >>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
>> >> index 8d57b1b..cd38022 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/xgene-dma.c
>> >> @@ -1707,7 +1707,6 @@ static void xgene_dma_set_caps(struct xgene_dma_chan *chan,
>> >>       dma_cap_zero(dma_dev->cap_mask);
>> >>
>> >>       /* Set DMA device capability */
>> >> -     dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dma_dev->cap_mask);
>> >>       dma_cap_set(DMA_SG, dma_dev->cap_mask);
>> >
>> > This will not work. Still clients can invoke memcpy operation. You need to
>> > remove the callback
>>
>> Got it, instead of removing the callback registration can we keep it
>> inside the condition like..
>>
>> if (dma_has_cap(DMA_MEMCPY, dma_dev->cap_mask))
>>             dma_dev->device_prep_dma_memcpy = xgene_dma_prep_memcpy;
>
> But the code is dead and will not be tested and hence not maintained. I do
> not see a reason to keep dead code in kernel

Got it, I will remove the memcpy offload support and will send another
patch for review.
>
> --
> ~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/