[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014111820.GV1492@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:18:20 +0300
From: "mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Tirdea, Irina" <irina.tirdea@...el.com>,
Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
Aleksei Mamlin <mamlinav@...il.com>,
Karsten Merker <merker@...ian.org>,
"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Purdila, Octavian" <octavian.purdila@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/9] Input: goodix - reset device at init
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:23:03PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I understand why one might use acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios() to augment
> data in ACPI, however here we have completely different issue: driver
> that expects named gpios gets returned gpio that has nothing to do with
> what it requested, because gpiolib acpi code always falls back to
> unnamed gpio if it does not find named gpio. That can be acceptable if
> driver uses the same con_id for all requests to gpiolib, but is not
> working when driver supplies different con_ids.
Right, the ACPI fallback ignores con_id completely and uses only the
index.
AFAIK there is only one driver using ACPI _CRS index method:
sdhci-[acpi|pci].c. If we can convert that to use acpi_dev_add_driver_gpios()
to feed names for card detection GPIOs, I think we can remove the
fallback alltogether in favor of named GPIOs for ACPI.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists