lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:26:19 +0800
From:	Jian Zhou <jianjay.zhou@...wei.com>
To:	<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <herongguang.he@...wei.com>,
	<zhang.zhanghailiang@...wei.com>, <gleb@...nel.org>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<x86@...nel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<weidong.huang@...wei.com>, <peter.huangpeng@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: enable LBR virtualization

On 12/10/2015 20:44, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 12/10/2015 14:10, Jian Zhou wrote:
>> ping...
>
> I think your expectations for review RTT are a bit too optimistic.
> I have only worked 4 hours since you posted the patch...  But it was on
> my list anyway, so let's do it.

   Thank for Paolo's time to review and valuable comments. :)

> First of all, you should move the implementation entirely into vmx.c,
> because these new hooks are not acceptable:
>
>>> +	void (*vmcs_write64)(unsigned long field, u64 value);
>>> +	u64 (*vmcs_read64)(unsigned long field);
>>> +
>>> +	int (*add_atomic_switch_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 guest_val, u64 host_val);
>>> +	void (*disable_intercept_guest_msr)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr);
>
> x86.c must not have any knowledge of VMX internals such as the VMCS.
> Also, AMD have their own implementation of LBR virtualization.

   ok. These hooks will be modified in the next patch.

> In addition, the MSR numbers may differ between the guest and the host,
> because it is possible to emulate e.g. a Core CPU on a Core 2 CPU.  So I
> recommend against using the atomic switch mechanism for the from/to MSRs.

   The vLBR feature depends on vPMU, and to enable vPMU, it needs to
   specify the "cpu mode" in the guest XML as host-passthrough. I think
   the MSR numbers between the guest and the host are the same in this
   senario.

> Instead, if GUEST_DEBUGCTL.LBR = 1 you can read the from/to MSRs into an
> array stored in struct kvm_arch_vcpu at vmexit time.  Reading the
> from/to MSRs should cause a vmexit in the first implementation.  Any
> optimization of this can be done separately.

   ok. I will compare this method to atomic switch mechanism.

> As a benefit, this will force you to implement a mechanism for passing
> the contents of the MSRs to userspace and read them back.  This is
> necessary for debugging and for migration.  You will also have to
> implement support for the feature in QEMU in order to support migration
> of virtual machines that use LBRs.

   ok. Migration will be supported in the next patch.

>>> +/* Core 2 and Atom last-branch recording */
>>> +#define MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_TOS		0x000001c9
>>> +#define MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_0_FROM_IP	0x00000040
>>> +#define MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_0_TO_IP	0x00000060
>>> +#define NUM_MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO	4
>>> +#define NUM_MSR_ATOM_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO	8
>>> +
>>> +struct lbr_info {
>>> +	u32 base, count;
>>> +} p4_lbr[] = {
>>> +	{ MSR_LBR_SELECT,               1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LER_FROM_LIP,          1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LER_TO_LIP,            1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_TOS,        1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_0_FROM_LIP, NUM_MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_0_TO_LIP,   NUM_MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ 0, 0 }
>>> +}, c2_lbr[] = {
>>> +	{ MSR_LBR_SELECT,               1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP,       1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP,         1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_TOS,        1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_0_FROM_IP,  NUM_MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_0_TO_IP,    NUM_MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ 0, 0 }
>>> +}, nh_lbr[] = {
>>> +	{ MSR_LBR_SELECT,               1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP,       1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP,         1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_TOS,        1 },
>
> Nehalem has 16 LBR records, not 4.  I suggest that you reorganize the
> tables so that it is easy to match them against tables in the Intel SDM.
> Note that you have to compute the number of records according to the
> _guest_ CPUID, not the host CPUID.  For simplicity I suggest that you
> only enable LBR virtualization if the host machine has 16 LBR entries,

   ok. The table will be reorganized in the next patch.

> and make it possible to disable it through a kvm_intel module parameter.

   A kvm_intel module parameter will be added to permanently disable
   LBR virtualization in the next patch.

   Thanks and regards,

   Jian

> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_0_FROM_LIP, NUM_MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_0_TO_LIP,   NUM_MSR_P4_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ 0, 0 }
>>> +}, at_lbr[] = {
>>> +	{ MSR_LBR_SELECT,               1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP,       1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_IA32_LASTINTTOIP,         1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_TOS,        1 },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_0_FROM_IP,  NUM_MSR_ATOM_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ MSR_C2_LASTBRANCH_0_TO_IP,    NUM_MSR_ATOM_LASTBRANCH_FROM_TO },
>>> +	{ 0, 0 }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static const struct lbr_info *last_branch_msr_get(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	switch ( boot_cpu_data.x86 )
>>> +	{
>>> +		case 6:
>>> +			switch ( boot_cpu_data.x86_model )
>>> +			{
>>> +				/* Core2 Duo */
>>> +				case 15:
>>> +				/* Enhanced Core */
>>> +				case 23:
>>> +					return c2_lbr;
>>> +					break;
>>> +				/* Nehalem */
>>> +				case 26: case 30: case 31: case 46:
>>> +				/* Westmere */
>>> +				case 37: case 44: case 47:
>>> +				/* Sandy Bridge */
>>> +				case 42: case 45:
>>> +				/* Ivy Bridge */
>>> +				case 58: case 62:
>>> +				/* Haswell */
>>> +				case 60: case 63: case 69: case 70:
>>> +				/* future */
>>> +				case 61: case 78:
>>> +					return nh_lbr;
>>> +					break;
>>> +				/* Atom */
>>> +				case 28: case 38: case 39: case 53: case 54:
>>> +				/* Silvermont */
>>> +				case 55: case 74: case 77: case 90: case 93:
>>> +					return at_lbr;
>>> +					break;
>>> +			}
>>> +			break;
>>> +		case 15:
>>> +			switch ( boot_cpu_data.x86_model )
>>> +			{
>>> +				/* Pentium4/Xeon with em64t */
>>> +				case 3: case 4: case 6:
>>> +					return p4_lbr;
>>> +					break;
>>> +			}
>>> +			break;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static int emulator_fix_hypercall(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt);
>>>
>>>    static inline void kvm_async_pf_hash_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>> @@ -1917,6 +2024,10 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>>    	bool pr = false;
>>>    	u32 msr = msr_info->index;
>>>    	u64 data = msr_info->data;
>>> +	u64 supported = 0;
>>> +	static const struct lbr_info *lbr = NULL;
>>> +	int i = 0;
>>> +	int value = 0;
>>>
>>>    	switch (msr) {
>>>    	case MSR_AMD64_NB_CFG:
>>> @@ -1948,16 +2059,34 @@ int kvm_set_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>>    		}
>>>    		break;
>>>    	case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
>>> -		if (!data) {
>>> -			/* We support the non-activated case already */
>>> -			break;
>>> -		} else if (data & ~(DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF)) {
>>> -			/* Values other than LBR and BTF are vendor-specific,
>>> -			   thus reserved and should throw a #GP */
>>> +		supported = DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR | DEBUGCTLMSR_BTF | DEBUGCTLMSR_FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI;
>>> +
>>> +		if (data & ~supported) {
>>> +			/* Values other than LBR, BTF and FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI are not supported,
>>> +			 * thus reserved and should throw a #GP */
>>> +			vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "unsupported MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR wrmsr: 0x%llx\n", data);
>>>    			return 1;
>>>    		}
>>> -		vcpu_unimpl(vcpu, "%s: MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR 0x%llx, nop\n",
>>> -			    __func__, data);
>>> +
>>> +		if (data & DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR) {
>>> +			lbr = last_branch_msr_get();
>>> +			if (lbr == NULL)
>>> +				break;
>>> +
>>> +			for (; (value == 0) && lbr->count; lbr++)
>>> +				for (i = 0; (value == 0) && (i < lbr->count); i++)
>>> +					if ((value = kvm_x86_ops->add_atomic_switch_msr(vcpu, lbr->base + i, 0, 0)) == 0)
>>> +						kvm_x86_ops->disable_intercept_guest_msr(vcpu, lbr->base + i);
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>> +		if (value == 0) {
>>> +			kvm_x86_ops->vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL, data);
>>> +		}
>>> +		else {
>>> +			/* throw a #GP */
>>> +			return 1;
>>> +		}
>>> +
>>>    		break;
>>>    	case 0x200 ... 0x2ff:
>>>    		return kvm_mtrr_set_msr(vcpu, msr, data);
>>> @@ -2178,9 +2307,11 @@ static int get_msr_mce(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr, u64 *pdata)
>>>    int kvm_get_msr_common(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
>>>    {
>>>    	switch (msr_info->index) {
>>> +	case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
>>> +		msr_info->data = kvm_x86_ops->vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_DEBUGCTL);
>>> +		break;
>>>    	case MSR_IA32_PLATFORM_ID:
>>>    	case MSR_IA32_EBL_CR_POWERON:
>>> -	case MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR:
>>>    	case MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHFROMIP:
>>>    	case MSR_IA32_LASTBRANCHTOIP:
>>>    	case MSR_IA32_LASTINTFROMIP:
>>> --
>>> 1.7.12.4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
> .
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ