[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561E3F5B.6040102@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:41:15 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<nsekhar@...com>, <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
<dwmw2@...radead.org>, <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] mtd: nand: omap2: Start dma request before enabling
prefetch
On 13/10/15 04:38, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
> The prefetch engine sends a dma request once a FIFO threshold has
> been met. No other requests are received until the previous request
> is handled.
>
> Starting an edma transfer (dma_async_issue_pending) results in any
> previous event for the dma channel to be cleared. Therefore, starting
> the prefetch engine before initiating the dma transfer may result in
> the prefetch triggering a dma request but instead of it being handled
> it can end up being cleared. This will result in a hang since the code
> will continue to wait for the dma request to complete.
>
> By initiating the dma request before enabling the prefetch engine this
> race condition is avoided and no dma request are missed/cleared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> index 957c32f..94d11de 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/omap2.c
> @@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ static inline int omap_nand_dma_transfer(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *addr,
> tx->callback_param = &info->comp;
> dmaengine_submit(tx);
>
> + init_completion(&info->comp);
> + dma_async_issue_pending(info->dma);
> +
> /* configure and start prefetch transfer */
> ret = omap_prefetch_enable(info->gpmc_cs,
> PREFETCH_FIFOTHRESHOLD_MAX, 0x1, len, is_write, info);
> @@ -516,9 +519,6 @@ static inline int omap_nand_dma_transfer(struct mtd_info *mtd, void *addr,
> /* PFPW engine is busy, use cpu copy method */
> goto out_copy_unmap;
>
> - init_completion(&info->comp);
> - dma_async_issue_pending(info->dma);
> -
> /* setup and start DMA using dma_addr */
Is the above comment misplaced after this change?
> wait_for_completion(&info->comp);
> tim = 0;
>
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists