| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1444826277-94060-2-git-send-email-xiakaixu@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 12:37:56 +0000
From: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
To: <ast@...mgrid.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <acme@...nel.org>,
<mingo@...hat.com>, <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <xiakaixu@...wei.com>, <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pi3orama@....com>,
<hekuang@...wei.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] bpf: control the trace data output on current cpu when perf sampling
This patch adds the flag sample_disable to control the trace data
output process when perf sampling. By setting this flag and
integrating with ebpf, we can control the data output process and
get the samples we are most interested in.
The bpf helper bpf_perf_event_sample_control() can control the
perf_event on current cpu.
Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 3 ++-
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 3 ++-
kernel/events/core.c | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index 092a0e8..dcbf7d5 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ struct perf_event {
struct irq_work pending;
atomic_t event_limit;
+ atomic_t sample_disable;
void (*destroy)(struct perf_event *);
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 564f1f0..e2c99c6 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -287,6 +287,11 @@ enum bpf_func_id {
* Return: realm if != 0
*/
BPF_FUNC_get_route_realm,
+
+ /**
+ * u64 bpf_perf_event_sample_control(&map, index, flag)
+ */
+ BPF_FUNC_perf_event_sample_control,
__BPF_FUNC_MAX_ID,
};
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 2881145..a2b9dd7 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -331,7 +331,8 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
comm_exec : 1, /* flag comm events that are due to an exec */
use_clockid : 1, /* use @clockid for time fields */
context_switch : 1, /* context switch data */
- __reserved_1 : 37;
+ sample_disable : 1, /* don't output data on samples */
+ __reserved_1 : 36;
union {
__u32 wakeup_events; /* wakeup every n events */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1d6b97b..3ffe630 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ static const struct {
} func_limit[] = {
{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_tail_call},
{BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read},
+ {BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY, BPF_FUNC_perf_event_sample_control},
};
static void print_verifier_state(struct verifier_env *env)
@@ -910,7 +911,7 @@ static int check_map_func_compatibility(struct bpf_map *map, int func_id)
* don't allow any other map type to be passed into
* the special func;
*/
- if (bool_map != bool_func)
+ if (bool_func && bool_map != bool_func)
return -EINVAL;
}
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index b11756f..942351c 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -6337,6 +6337,9 @@ static int __perf_event_overflow(struct perf_event *event,
irq_work_queue(&event->pending);
}
+ if (!atomic_read(&event->sample_disable))
+ return ret;
+
if (event->overflow_handler)
event->overflow_handler(event, data, regs);
else
@@ -7709,6 +7712,14 @@ static void account_event(struct perf_event *event)
account_event_cpu(event, event->cpu);
}
+static void perf_event_check_sample_flag(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ if (event->attr.sample_disable == 1)
+ atomic_set(&event->sample_disable, 0);
+ else
+ atomic_set(&event->sample_disable, 1);
+}
+
/*
* Allocate and initialize a event structure
*/
@@ -7840,6 +7851,8 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr *attr, int cpu,
}
}
+ perf_event_check_sample_flag(event);
+
return event;
err_per_task:
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 0fe96c7..f261333 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -215,6 +215,36 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_read_proto = {
.arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
+static u64 bpf_perf_event_sample_control(u64 r1, u64 index, u64 flag, u64 r4, u64 r5)
+{
+ struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *) (unsigned long) r1;
+ struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
+ struct perf_event *event;
+
+ if (unlikely(index >= array->map.max_entries))
+ return -E2BIG;
+
+ event = (struct perf_event *)array->ptrs[index];
+ if (!event)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ if (flag)
+ atomic_dec(&event->sample_disable);
+ else
+ atomic_inc(&event->sample_disable);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_perf_event_sample_control_proto = {
+ .func = bpf_perf_event_sample_control,
+ .gpl_only = false,
+ .ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
+ .arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
+ .arg2_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+ .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
+};
+
static const struct bpf_func_proto *kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
{
switch (func_id) {
@@ -242,6 +272,8 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto *kprobe_prog_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func
return &bpf_get_smp_processor_id_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_read:
return &bpf_perf_event_read_proto;
+ case BPF_FUNC_perf_event_sample_control:
+ return &bpf_perf_event_sample_control_proto;
default:
return NULL;
}
--
1.8.3.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists