linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Bumps limit of maximum core ID from 32 to 128.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <561E60D0.8040606@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 07:04:00 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	"Odzioba, Lukasz" <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
Cc:	"jdelvare@...e.de" <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Bumps limit of maximum core ID from 32 to 128.

On 10/14/2015 04:39 AM, Odzioba, Lukasz wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 3:17 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> Applied, after fixing up the subject and listing the current required limit
>> of 72 cores for Xeon Phi (per published information).
>
> Guenter sorry for inconvenience I forgot that core enumeration on KNL
> is not continuous, so some core ID's are not used. Thus we have to
> change limit to 76 instead of 72.
>
That is just in the comment. The actual limit is still 128.

Guenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/