[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014031043.GA3775@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:10:43 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@...wei.com>
Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
Sriram Raghunathan <sriram.r@...ia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf:Adding --list-opts to usage string
Em Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:29:05AM +0800, Yunlong Song escreveu:
> On 2015/10/13 23:24, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> Em Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:59:50AM +0530, Sriram Raghunathan escreveu:
> >>> Minor change, adding --list-opts to usage string. So that it is
> >>> visible to the user on running perf --help. or just perf
> >>> from command line.
> >>
> >> Ramkumar, Yunlong, are you ok with this?
> > Not sure I understand the motivation, but I suppose it can't hurt to
> > show this detail?
> Agree with Ramkumar, --list-opts is redundant due to the existing [OPTIONS] in
> the perf_usage_string[].
I see, thinking about it now, it seems that this is because 'perf -h'
behaves differently from other tools, i.e.:
$ perf -h
usage: perf [--version] [--help] [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARGS]
The most commonly used perf commands are:
annotate Read perf.data (created by perf record) and display annotated code
archive Create archive with object files with build-ids found in perf.data file
bench General framework for benchmark suites
buildid-cache Manage build-id cache.
buildid-list List the buildids in a perf.data file
<SNIP>
test Runs sanity tests.
timechart Tool to visualize total system behavior during a workload
top System profiling tool.
trace strace inspired tool
probe Define new dynamic tracepoints
See 'perf help COMMAND' for more information on a specific command.
--------------------------
While:
$ perf stat -h
usage: perf stat [<options>] [<command>]
-T, --transaction hardware transaction statistics
-e, --event <event> event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events
--filter <filter>
event filter
-i, --no-inherit child tasks do not inherit counters
-p, --pid <pid> stat events on existing process id
-t, --tid <tid> stat events on existing thread id
-a, --all-cpus system-wide collection from all CPUs
<SNIP>
-I, --interval-print <n>
print counts at regular interval in ms (>= 10)
--per-socket aggregate counts per processor socket
--per-core aggregate counts per physical processor core
--per-thread aggregate counts per thread
-D, --delay <n> ms to wait before starting measurement after program start
--------------------------
One doesn't show what options can be used, the other does, so there is
an inconsistency, this and the fact that 'perf -h' outputs to stdout,
'perf stat -h' and the other builtins output to stderr. I think all
should output to stdout, just like 'ls --help', what do you think?
- Arnaldo
> >>>
> >>> const char perf_usage_string[] =
> >>> - "perf [--version] [--help] [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARGS]";
> >>> + "perf [--version] [--help] [--list-opts] [OPTIONS] COMMAND [ARGS]";
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Yunlong Song
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists