[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014144814.GW27370@localhost>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 20:18:14 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: nsekhar@...com, linux@....linux.org.uk, olof@...om.net,
arnd@...db.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
tony@...mide.com, r.schwebel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] dmaengine: ti-dma-crossbar: Add support for
crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 04:12:21PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> The DMA event crossbar on AM33xx/AM43xx is different from the one found in
> DRA7x family.
> Instead of a single event crossbar it has 64 identical mux attached to each
> eDMA event line. When the 0 event mux is selected, the default mapped event
> is going to be routed to the corresponding eDMA event line. If different
> mux is selected, then the selected event is going to be routed to the given
> eDMA event.
Why is crossbar patch in edma series?
> +static void ti_am335x_xbar_free(struct device *dev, void *route_data)
> +{
> + struct ti_am335x_xbar_data *xbar = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct ti_am335x_xbar_map *map = route_data;
> +
> + dev_err(dev, "Unmapping XBAR event %u on channel %u\n",
> + map->mux_val, map->dma_line);
Err ?
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists