linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Fix multiple GOP device support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151014151002.GD2782@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:10:02 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Kővágó, Zoltán <dirty.ice.hu@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Fix multiple GOP device support

On Wed, 14 Oct, at 05:04:26PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> > > So the fix patch is fine as-is for v4.3, but needs a conflict resolution for 
> > > the pending v4.4 commit.
> > > 
> > > I've applied it that way.
> > 
> > Do you need me to send a patch on top or have you taken care of the
> > semantic conflict for v4.4? (the change you originally proposed,
> > s/u32/u64/, looked fine)
> 
> So to not break bisection in hard to debug ways, I made this fixup in the merge 
> commit of your changes, and documented it all in the merge commit message:
> 
> commit 790a2ee2427852cff50993c98f15ed88511e9af0
> Merge: c7d77a7980e4 0f96a99dab36
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Date:   Wed Oct 14 16:05:40 2015 +0200

[...]

>     Note: there is a semantic conflict between the following two commits:
>     
>       8a53554e12e9 ("x86/efi: Fix multiple GOP device support")
>       ae2ee627dc87 ("efifb: Add support for 64-bit frame buffer addresses")
>     
>     I fixed up the interaction in the merge commit, changing the type of
>     current_fb_base from u32 to u64.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>

Awesome, thanks Ingo.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/