[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561E78E1.2020907@imgtec.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 16:46:41 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<jason@...edaemon.net>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
<jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
<linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 05/14] irq: add struct ipi_mask to irq_data
On 10/14/2015 03:50 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Qais Yousef wrote:
>
>> It has a similar role to affinity mask, but tracks the IPI affinity
>> instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@...tec.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/irq.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h
>> index 504133671985..b000b217ea24 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/irq.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/irq.h
>> @@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ struct irq_common_data {
>> void *handler_data;
>> struct msi_desc *msi_desc;
>> cpumask_var_t affinity;
>> + struct ipi_mask ipi_mask;
>> };
>
> This should be folded into patch 3, no?
For me they are 2 separate changes, hence the 2 commits. They could be
folded but I prefer the septation unless there's a strong opinion not to.
Thanks,
Qais
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists