[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151014165736.GT2048@uranus>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 19:57:36 +0300
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/4] x86/signal/64: Re-add support for SS in the 64-bit
signal context
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:42:58AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> That's the intent.
>
> If you write __pad = 0, don't set UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS, and leave cs
> set to a 64-bit value, then the kernel will detect that 0 is not a
> valid SS and will fix it for you.
>
> If you do write UC_STRICT_RESTORE_SS (e.g. if you saved on a new
> kernel and you restore the saved uc_flags), then you'll get a new
> signal delivered.
Yeah, I just wanna be sure I understood the patch correctly. Thanks!
> If you're restoring a 32-bit or 16-bit context, then none of the above
> applies, but I doubt that CRIU supports that anyway.
True. I didn't implemented compat mode for criu yet, it's in todo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists