[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561DE236.7010703@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:03:50 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Jungseok Lee <jungseoklee85@...il.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
olof@...om.net, broonie@...nel.org, david.griego@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under
function graph tracer
On 10/14/2015 12:24 AM, Jungseok Lee wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 7:01 PM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
>
> Hi Akashi,
>
>> Function graph tracer modifies a return address (LR) in a stack frame
>> to hook a function return. This will result in many useless entries
>> (return_to_handler) showing up in a stack tracer's output.
>>
>> This patch replaces such entries with originals values preserved in
>> current->ret_stack[].
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
>
> The following diff should be folded into this patch, not [7/7] one, to
> address build breakage.
Thanks.
I fixed all the build errors reported by kbuild test robot.
-Takahiro AKASHI
> ----8<----
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> index 407991b..7126d4d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> */
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> +#include <linux/ftrace.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/stacktrace.h>
> ----8<----
>
> Best Regards
> Jungseok Lee
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists