lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561F52BC.7040903@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:16:12 +0300
From:	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
CC:	<nsekhar@...com>, <linux@....linux.org.uk>, <olof@...om.net>,
	<arnd@...db.de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/24] dmaengine/ARM: Merge the edma drivers into one

On 10/14/2015 05:31 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 02:42:42PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Cover letter:
>>
>> with this series the edma two driver setup will be changed to have only one
>> driver to support eDMA3. The legacy edma interface will be removed and eDMA can
>> only be used via dmaengine API from this point on.
>> In order to do the merge the following improvements has been done:
>> - One driver instance per eDMA:
>>  - Any number of eDMA instances are supported (both legacy and DT boot)
>> - Not relying on global variables, arrays, etc
>> - Code simplification and optimizations in several places
>>
>> This change will also help us to do bigger changes in the eDMA driver since,
>> since now we have only one driver to work with.
> 
> I have applied this now. I got a conlfict on 3rd one while applying and also
> I got conflict while merging to next
> 
> Pls verify all is well!

Thanks Vinod,

It looks fine.
It is strange since I'm working on top of linux-next as well. The following
commit caused the conflict:
ddfe4d0cce78 dmaengine: edma: remove redundant conditions

I have it in my linux-next, but for some reason it is missing from your
topic/edma, so the series applied with conflicts there and when merging on top
of linux-next there were again conflict.

Thank you,
Péter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ