[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1444872183.2928.6.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:23:03 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, shannon.nelson@...el.com,
carolyn.wyborny@...el.com, donald.c.skidmore@...el.com,
matthew.vick@...el.com, john.ronciak@...el.com,
mitch.a.williams@...el.com, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] ixgb:Remove reducant error path after call
to ixgb_sw_init in the function ixgb_probe
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 18:57 -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> This removes the reducant error path and now no longer used goto
> label err_sw_init after the call to ixgb_probe in the function
> ixgb_sw_init after calling this function due to it always returning
> zero as it is guarantee to run successfully without any issues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgb/ixgb_main.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
This driver (ixgb), as well as e100 and e1000 are in maintenance mode
which means bug fixes ONLY!
Is this patch necessary? Answer: No
Is this a bug fix? Answer: No
Should you have sent this patch? See answers to previous questions.
Please ask these questions to yourself when putting together a patch
against these drivers (listed above).
With that said, dropping this series.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists