linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151015132200.GA7621@red-moon>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:22:00 +0100
From:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:	Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"hanjun.guo@...aro.org" <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
	Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	"msalter@...hat.com" <msalter@...hat.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86, pci, acpi: Move arch-agnostic MMCONFIG (aka
 ECAM) and ACPI code out of arch/x86/ directory

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 03:55:50PM +0100, Tomasz Nowicki wrote:

[...]

> > Well, I still have not figured out whether on arm64 the raw accessors
> > required by ACPICA make sense.
> >
> > So either arm64 relies on the generic MCFG based raw read and writes
> > or we define the global raw read and writes as empty (ie x86 overrides
> > them anyway).
> >
> 
> My concerns/ideas related to raw accessors for ARM64, please correct me 
> at any point.
> 
> ACPI spec - chapter: 19.5.96 OperationRegion (Declare Operation Region)
> defines PCI_Config as one of region types. Every time ASL opcode 
> operates on corresponding PCI config space region, ASL interpreter is 
> dispatching address space to our raw accessors, please see 
> acpi_ex_pci_config_space_handler, acpi_ev_pci_config_region_setup calls. 
> What is more important, such operations may happen after (yes after) bus 
> enumeration, but always raw accessors are called at the end with the 
> {segment, bus, dev, fn} tuple.
> 
> Giving above, here are some ideas:
> 1. We force somehow vendors to avoid operations on PCI config regions in 
> ASL code. PCI config region definitions still fall into Hardware Reduced 
> profile, so new ACPICA special subset for ARM64 is need. Then raw ACPI 
> accessors can be empty (and overridden by x86).

I am coming back to this, I am not sure that PCI config based OperationRegions
fall into Hardware Reduced profile, I will finally start a thread on ASWG
to check that.

Other than that, are you posting an updated version of this series soon ?
Let me know if you need help refactoring/testing the patches.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> 2. We provide raw accessors which translate {segment, bus, dev, fn} 
> tuple to Linux generic accessors (this can be considered only if PCI 
> config accesses happened after bus enumeration for HR profile, thus 
> tuple to bus structure map is possible).
> 4. We rely on the generic MCFG based raw read and writes.
> 
> Let me know your opinion.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tomasz
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/