[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561FB33F.5030906@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:07:59 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/seccomp: build and pass on arm64
On 10/06/2015 01:30 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> Changing arm64 syscalls is done via a specific register set, more like s390
> than like arm (specific ptrace call) and x86 (part of general registers).
> Since (restarting) poll doesn't exist on arm64, switch to using nanosleep
> for testing restart_syscall. And since it looks like the syscall ABI is
> inconsistent on arm-compat, so we must work around it (and document it) in
> the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> ---
> v3:
> - correctly set syscall number on native arm64.
> v2:
> - switch to nanosleep from a bad mix of poll and ppoll for testing restart.
> ---
Is this good to go? Failed to apply to linux-kselftest next.
If you can rebase and resend. I can get this into 4.4-rc1
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists