[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20151015101812.7cb6e917@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:18:12 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Li Bin <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, zhouchengming1@...wei.com,
xiexiuqi@...wei.com, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: function_graph: dump real return addr in
call trace
On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:51:33 +0100
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> Is this the same old problem caused by e306dfd06fcb ("ARM64: unwind: Fix
> PC calculation")? I've said previously that I'm happy to revert that if
> we're the only architecture with this behaviour, but Akashi resisted
> because there are other issues with ftrace that he was hoping to address
> and they would resolve this too.
Just a reference, but this patch is pretty much exactly what x86
currently has. I wonder if I should make that function generic for all
archs to use.
If you accept this patch, I can look at what archs do and pull out the
common code and place it into the core code and have the archs call
that instead.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists