lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561FC00C.7010003@arm.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:02:36 +0100
From:	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To:	Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, steve.capper@...aro.org,
	ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
	catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, christoffer.dall@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 08/11] arm64: Check for selected granule support

On 15/10/15 15:47, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 06:25 AM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
>> +    /*
>> +     * Check to see if the CPU supports the requested pagesize
>> +     */
>> +    asm volatile("mrs %0, ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1" : "=r" (aa64mmfr0_el1));
>> +    aa64mmfr0_el1 >>= ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN_SHIFT;
>> +    if ((aa64mmfr0_el1 & 0xf) != ID_AA64MMFR0_TGRAN_SUPPORTED) {
>> +        pr_efi_err(sys_table_arg, PAGE_SIZE_STR" granule not supported by the CPU\n");
>> +        return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>> +    }
>
>
> This is definitely an improvement over my original hack job.
>
> I would like to add, that I actually think this should be in a new function
> "check_kernel_compatibility" (or whatever) that is called before handle_kernel_image.
>
> That is because I don't really think it belongs in handle_kernel_image which is
>  focused on relocation.  Plus, if you add another function, you can avoid the
> "Failed to relocate kernel" error that comes out following the granule not supported message.
> Further, checks like this in the future will have a place to live.
>
> Of course you will then need a matching stubbed out function for the normal arm kernel as well.


OK, I will drop it from this series then and can be worked as a separate patch.

Thanks
Suzuki

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ