[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1444923568-17413-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:39:21 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc: Ma Jun <majun258@...wei.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/7] Adding core support for wire-MSI bridges
There seems to be a new class of interrupt controller out there whose
sole purpose (apart from making everybody's life a nightmare) is to
turn wired interrupts into MSIs.
Instead of considering that the MSIs allocated to a device are for the
direct use of that device, we can turn this set of MSIs into a irq
domain, and use that domain to build a standard irqchip on top of
that.
This requires some (slightly ugly) surgery in both the generic MSI and
platform MSI layers, but the amount of code is actually relatively
small (about +150 LoC so far).
On top of that, we add a dummy driver for a such a bridge, hoping that
this will give enough information to driver authors so that they can
use this new feature. An even more stupid client driver is provided to
show the interrupt stack allocation:
dummydev dummy-dev: Probing
dummydev dummy-dev: Allocated IRQ35
dummydev dummy-dev: Probing OK
dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 5 domain msichip_domain_ops
dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 0 domain msi_domain_ops
dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 8192 domain its_domain_ops
dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 8192 domain gic_irq_domain_ops
While this seems to work, it is far from being perfect:
- This is a prototype: error handling is rubbish, and there could be
better abstractions to use.
- It relies on not declaring this bridge with IRQCHIP_DECLARE in order
to prevent the DT layer from allocating interrupts behind our back.
- There is some probe ordering issues between the bridge and the wired
interrupt device, leading to the use of -EPROBE_DEFER.
The last two points could be addressed directly in the OF layer, as
this is a generic device ordering issue (and people are already
working on that).
I'd welcome any comment on that approach (though I'm going to make
myself scarse over the next two weeks).
Marc Zyngier (7):
platform-msi: Allow MSIs to be allocated in chunks
platform-msi: Factor out allocation/free of private data
irqdomain: Make irq_domain_alloc_irqs_recursive available
genirq/msi: Make the .prepare callback reusable
genirq/msi: Add msi_domain_populate_irqs
platform-msi: Allow creation of a MSI-based stacked irq domain
irqchip: [Example] dummy wired interrupt/MSI bridge driver
drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 ++
drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/irqchip/irq-msichip.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 3 +
include/linux/msi.h | 16 +++
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 6 +-
kernel/irq/msi.c | 47 +++++++-
8 files changed, 481 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-msichip.c
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists