[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <561FDB37.3040602@caviumnetworks.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:58:31 -0700
From: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Sakshi Bansal <sakshi.april5@...il.com>,
<devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>, <helen.fornazier@...il.com>,
Paul Martin <paul.martin@...ethink.co.uk>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<david.daney@...ium.com>, <janne.huttunen@...ia.com>,
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <jtk54@...nell.edu>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
<aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>, <jamie.lawler@...il.com>,
<joe@...ches.com>, <robertoxmed@...il.com>,
<okash.khawaja@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: octeon: fixed few coding style warnings
On 10/15/2015 06:40 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 09:09:04AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>> and make sure you don't break the driver.
>
> I'm not seeing how this patch breaks anything? What am I missing?
Did you apply it and then compile the result? If not, then how can you
assert that it does not break anything?
From SubmitChecklist item #2: "Builds cleanly ..."
I don't want to waste time considering patches that don't, at a minimum,
meet this criterion. Other people may want to do the build testing, but
I prefer that the patch submitter at least vet the patch enough that
they can assert that it still builds cleanly.
David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists