linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] timer: Improve itimers scalability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1444935623.29506.14.camel@j-VirtualBox>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:00:23 -0700
From:	Jason Low <jason.low@....com>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
Cc:	jason.low2@...com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dave@...olabs.net,
	fweisbec@...il.com, hideaki.kimura@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	scott.norton@....com, terry.rudd@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] timer: Improve itimers scalability

On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 17:18 -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> I'm going to give 4/4 a closer look to see if the races with timer
> expiration make more sense to me than last time around.
> (E.g. do CPU time signals even work in CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL?)
> 
> But although I haven't yet convinced myself the current code is right,
> the changes don't seem to make it any worse.  So consider all four
> 
> Reviewed-by: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>

Thanks George!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/