[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5003.1444938039@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 20:40:39 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, james.l.morris@...cle.com, serge@...lyn.com,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Taesoo Kim <taesoo@...ech.edu>,
Yeongjin Jang <yeongjin.jang@...ech.edu>,
"Yun, Insu" <insu@...ech.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] keys: correctly check failed allocation for kmemdup
Insu Yun <wuninsu@...il.com> wrote:
> Thanks David. Then it is not a bug.
> It's a pure question.
> Why use different name for allocation and check?
> For me, it is quite confusing.
Either I didn't notice at the time, or the shorter variant is the original.
If you want to give me a patch making it consistent, feel free.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists