linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] phy: keystone: serdes driver for gbe 10gbe and pcie

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9008744.UmMoJzNEVK@wuerfel>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:53:16 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	"Kwok, WingMan" <w-kwok2@...com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	KISHON VIJAY ABRAHAM <kishon@...com>,
	"Quadros, Roger" <rogerq@...com>,
	"Karicheri, Muralidharan" <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"ssantosh@...nel.org" <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] phy: keystone: serdes driver for gbe 10gbe and pcie

On Thursday 15 October 2015 20:08:32 Kwok, WingMan wrote:
> 
> > > +#define reg_rmw(addr, value, mask) \
> > > +   __raw_writel(((__raw_readl(addr) & (~(mask))) | \
> > > +                   (value & (mask))), (addr))
> > 
> > not endian safe, and potentially racy.
> > 
> 
> will change to 
> 
> #define reg_rmw(addr, value, mask) \
>         writel(((readl(addr) & (~(mask))) | \
>                         (value & (mask))), (addr))

Ok, sounds good. Note that if any of this is performance critical,
better use readl_relaxed(), but as long as this is just for setup
code and not for data transfers, staying with readl() as you
suggest is better.

> > > +static inline void _kserdes_reset_cdr(void __iomem *sregs, int lane)
> > > +{
> > > +   /* toggle signal detect */
> > > +   _kserdes_force_signal_detect_low(sregs, lane);
> > > +   mdelay(1);
> > > +   _kserdes_force_signal_detect_high(sregs, lane);
> > > +}
> > 
> > Can you change the code so you can use msleep(1) here?
> > 
> 
> will replace delays with usleep_range()

Ok.

> > > +
> > > +   do {
> > > +           mdelay(10);
> > > +           memset(lane_down, 0, sizeof(lane_down));
> > > +
> > > +           link_up = _kserdes_check_link_status(dev, sregs,
> > > +                                                pcsr_regmap, lanes,
> > > +                                                lanes_enable,
> > > +                                                current_state, lane_down);
> > > +
> > > +           /* if we did not get link up then wait 100ms
> > > +            * before calling it again
> > > +            */
> > > +           if (link_up)
> > > +                   break;
> > > +
> > > +           for (i = 0; i < lanes; i++) {
> > > +                   if ((lanes_enable & (1 << i)) && lane_down[i])
> > > +                           dev_dbg(dev,
> > > +                                   "XGE: detected lane down on lane %d\n",
> > > +                                   i);
> > > +           }
> > > +
> > > +           if (++retries > 100)
> > > +                   return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > > +
> > > +   } while (!link_up);
> > 
> > an more importantly here. Blocking the CPU for over one second is not good.
> > 
> > Any use of mdelay() should have a comment explaining why you cannot use
> > msleep() in that instance.
> > 
> 
> will replace delays with usleep_range()

Here you have to be careful with the total runtime. Using usleep_range()
is a good idea, and you can have a particularly wide range, but then you
should changen the timeout condition from number of retries to total
elapsed time like

	unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ; /* 1 second maximum */
	do {
		...

		if (link_up)
			break;

		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout)
			return -ETIMEOUT;

		usleep_range(1000, 50000);
	} while (1);

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/