linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI / tables: simplify acpi_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1716674.6oaNdqBolQ@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:37:18 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
Cc:	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ACPI / tables: simplify acpi_parse_entries

On Thursday, October 15, 2015 09:57:38 AM Al Stone wrote:
> On 10/15/2015 09:44 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> > 
> > On 01/10/15 16:11, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >> acpi_parse_entries passes the table end pointer to the sub-table entry
> >> handler. acpi_parse_entries itself could validate the end of an entry
> >> against the table end using the length in the sub-table entry.
> >>
> >> This patch adds the validation of the sub-table entry end using the
> >> length field.This will help to eliminate the need to pass the table end
> >> to the handlers.
> >>
> >> It also moves the check for zero length entry early so that execution of
> >> the handler can be avoided.
> >>
> >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> > 
> > Now that Al's MADT is queued, can you consider applying these ?
> > 
> 
> I think we have to remove my patches from the queue until I can make
> them arch-specific; doing these MADT checks breaks far too many existing
> x86 systems where the firmware does things it should not;

Right.  I've dropped the series already.

> re-reading some of the ia64 kernel code, there's a pathological case there
> where it could break (but shouldn't if iasl is being used to compile tables).

I wouldn't count on iasl being used.

> I'll be working on the new version today.

Thanks!

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/