Message-Id: <1444949467-34807-5-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:51:06 -0400
From:	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@....com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@....com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/locking/core v8 4/5] locking/pvqspinlock: Allow 1 lock stealing attempt

This patch allows one attempt for the lock waiter to steal the lock
when entering the PV slowpath. To prevent lock starvation, the pending
bit will be set by the queue head vCPU when it is in the active lock
spinning loop to disable any lock stealing attempt.  This helps to
reduce the performance penalty caused by lock waiter preemption while
not having much of the downsides of a real unfair lock.

The pv_wait_head() function was renamed as pv_wait_head_lock() as it
was modified to acquire the lock before returning. This is necessary
because of possible lock stealing attempts from other tasks.

Linux kernel builds were run in KVM guest on an 8-socket, 4
cores/socket Westmere-EX system and a 4-socket, 8 cores/socket
Haswell-EX system. Both systems are configured to have 32 physical
CPUs. The kernel build times before and after the patch were:

                    Westmere                    Haswell
  Patch         32 vCPUs    48 vCPUs    32 vCPUs    48 vCPUs
  -----         --------    --------    --------    --------
  Before patch   3m15.6s    10m56.1s     1m44.1s     5m29.1s
  After patch    3m02.3s     5m00.2s     1m43.7s     3m03.5s

For the overcommited case (48 vCPUs), this patch is able to reduce
kernel build time by more than 54% for Westmere and 44% for Haswell.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
---
 kernel/locking/qspinlock.c          |   29 ++++++--
 kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h |  126 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 7868418..76f3441 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -251,15 +251,16 @@ static __always_inline void __pv_init_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
 static __always_inline void __pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
 static __always_inline void __pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock,
 					   struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
-static __always_inline void __pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock,
-					   struct mcs_spinlock *node) { }
+static __always_inline u32  __pv_wait_head_lock(struct qspinlock *lock,
+						struct mcs_spinlock *node)
+						{ return 0; }
 
 #define pv_enabled()		false
 
 #define pv_init_node		__pv_init_node
 #define pv_wait_node		__pv_wait_node
 #define pv_kick_node		__pv_kick_node
-#define pv_wait_head		__pv_wait_head
+#define pv_wait_head_lock	__pv_wait_head_lock
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS
 #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath	native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
@@ -420,10 +421,22 @@ queue:
 	 * sequentiality; this is because the set_locked() function below
 	 * does not imply a full barrier.
 	 *
+	 * The PV pv_wait_head_lock function, if active, will acquire the lock
+	 * and return a non-zero value. So we have to skip the
+	 * smp_load_acquire() call. As the next PV queue head hasn't been
+	 * designated yet, there is no way for the locked value to become
+	 * _Q_SLOW_VAL. So both the redundant set_locked() and the
+	 * atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() calls will be safe. The cost of the
+	 * redundant set_locked() call below should be negligible, too.
+	 *
+	 * If PV isn't active, 0 will be returned instead.
 	 */
-	pv_wait_head(lock, node);
-	while ((val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter)) & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)
-		cpu_relax();
+	val = pv_wait_head_lock(lock, node);
+	if (!val) {
+		while ((val = smp_load_acquire(&lock->val.counter))
+				& _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK)
+			cpu_relax();
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * claim the lock:
@@ -436,7 +449,7 @@ queue:
 	 * to grab the lock.
 	 */
 	for (;;) {
-		if (val != tail) {
+		if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) != tail) {
 			set_locked(lock);
 			break;
 		}
@@ -481,7 +494,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
 #undef pv_init_node
 #undef pv_wait_node
 #undef pv_kick_node
-#undef pv_wait_head
+#undef pv_wait_head_lock
 
 #undef  queued_spin_lock_slowpath
 #define queued_spin_lock_slowpath	__pv_queued_spin_lock_slowpath
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
index 730fdac..f447ef8 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h
@@ -41,6 +41,56 @@ struct pv_node {
 };
 
 /*
+ * Allow one unfair trylock when entering the PV slowpath when the pending
+ * bit isn't set to reduce the performance impact of lock waiter preemption
+ *
+ * By replacing the regular queued_spin_trylock() with the function below,
+ * it will be called once when a lock waiter enter the slowpath before being
+ * queued.
+ *
+ * A little bit of unfairness here can improve performance without many
+ * of the downsides of a real unfair lock.
+ */
+#define queued_spin_trylock(l)	pv_queued_spin_trylock_unfair(l)
+static inline bool pv_queued_spin_trylock_unfair(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	return !(atomic_read(&lock->val) & _Q_LOCKED_PENDING_MASK) &&
+		(cmpxchg(&l->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0);
+}
+
+/*
+ * The pending bit is used by the queue head vCPU to indicate that it
+ * is actively spinning on the lock and no lock stealing is allowed.
+ */
+#if _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8
+static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(l->pending, 0);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void set_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
+
+	WRITE_ONCE(l->pending, 1);
+}
+#else /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
+static __always_inline void clear_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	atomic_clear_mask(&lock->val, _Q_PENDING_MASK);
+}
+
+static __always_inline void set_pending(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	atomic_set_mask(&lock->val, _Q_PENDING_MASK);
+}
+#endif /* _Q_PENDING_BITS == 8 */
+
+/*
  * PV qspinlock statistics
  */
 enum pv_qlock_stat {
@@ -49,6 +99,7 @@ enum pv_qlock_stat {
 	pvstat_wait_again,
 	pvstat_kick_wait,
 	pvstat_kick_unlock,
+	pvstat_steal_lock,
 	pvstat_spurious,
 	pvstat_hops,
 	pvstat_num	/* Total number of statistics counts */
@@ -67,6 +118,7 @@ static const char * const stat_fsnames[pvstat_num] = {
 	[pvstat_wait_again]  = "wait_again_count",
 	[pvstat_kick_wait]   = "kick_wait_count",
 	[pvstat_kick_unlock] = "kick_unlock_count",
+	[pvstat_steal_lock]  = "lock_stealing_count",
 	[pvstat_spurious]    = "spurious_wakeup",
 	[pvstat_hops]	     = "hash_hops_count",
 };
@@ -146,6 +198,19 @@ static inline void pvstat_hop(int hopcnt)
 }
 
 /*
+ * PV unfair trylock count tracking function
+ */
+static inline int pvstat_trylock_unfair(struct qspinlock *lock)
+{
+	int ret = pv_queued_spin_trylock_unfair(lock);
+
+	pvstat_inc(pvstat_steal_lock, ret);
+	return ret;
+}
+#undef  queued_spin_trylock
+#define queued_spin_trylock(l)	pvstat_trylock_unfair(l)
+
+/*
  * Replacement function for pv_kick()
  */
 static inline void __pv_kick(int cpu)
@@ -339,8 +404,8 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 
 		/*
 		 * If pv_kick_node() changed us to vcpu_hashed, retain that
-		 * value so that pv_wait_head() knows to not also try to hash
-		 * this lock.
+		 * value so that pv_wait_head_lock() knows to not also try
+		 * to hash this lock.
 		 */
 		cmpxchg(&pn->state, vcpu_halted, vcpu_running);
 
@@ -364,8 +429,9 @@ static void pv_wait_node(struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 /*
  * Called after setting next->locked = 1 when we're the lock owner.
  *
- * Instead of waking the waiters stuck in pv_wait_node() advance their state such
- * that they're waiting in pv_wait_head(), this avoids a wake/sleep cycle.
+ * Instead of waking the waiters stuck in pv_wait_node() advance their state
+ * such that they're waiting in pv_wait_head_lock(), this avoids a
+ * wake/sleep cycle.
  */
 static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 {
@@ -394,10 +460,13 @@ static void pv_kick_node(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 }
 
 /*
- * Wait for l->locked to become clear; halt the vcpu after a short spin.
+ * Wait for l->locked to become clear and acquire the lock;
+ * halt the vcpu after a short spin.
  * __pv_queued_spin_unlock() will wake us.
+ *
+ * The current value of the lock will be returned for additional processing.
  */
-static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
+static u32 pv_wait_head_lock(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 {
 	struct pv_node *pn = (struct pv_node *)node;
 	struct __qspinlock *l = (void *)lock;
@@ -413,11 +482,24 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 		lp = (struct qspinlock **)1;
 
 	for (;; waitcnt++) {
+		/*
+		 * Set the pending bit in the active lock spinning loop to
+		 * disable lock stealing. However, the pending bit check in
+		 * pv_queued_spin_trylock_unfair() and the setting/clearing
+		 * of pending bit here aren't memory barriers. So a cmpxchg()
+		 * is used to acquire the lock to be sure.
+		 */
+		set_pending(lock);
 		for (loop = SPIN_THRESHOLD; loop; loop--) {
-			if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked))
-				return;
+			if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked) &&
+			   (cmpxchg(&l->locked, 0, _Q_LOCKED_VAL) == 0)) {
+				clear_pending(lock);
+				goto gotlock;
+			}
 			cpu_relax();
 		}
+		clear_pending(lock);
+
 
 		if (!lp) { /* ONCE */
 			lp = pv_hash(lock, pn);
@@ -433,36 +515,36 @@ static void pv_wait_head(struct qspinlock *lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
 			 *
 			 * Matches the smp_rmb() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock().
 			 */
-			if (!cmpxchg(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, _Q_SLOW_VAL)) {
+			if (xchg(&l->locked, _Q_SLOW_VAL) == 0) {
 				/*
-				 * The lock is free and _Q_SLOW_VAL has never
-				 * been set. Therefore we need to unhash before
-				 * getting the lock.
+				 * The lock was free and now we own the lock.
+				 * Change the lock value back to _Q_LOCKED_VAL
+				 * and unhash the table.
 				 */
+				WRITE_ONCE(l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL);
 				WRITE_ONCE(*lp, NULL);
-				return;
+				goto gotlock;
 			}
 		}
 		pvstat_inc(pvstat_wait_head, true);
 		pvstat_inc(pvstat_wait_again, waitcnt);
 		pv_wait(&l->locked, _Q_SLOW_VAL);
 
-		if (!READ_ONCE(l->locked))
-			return;
 		/*
 		 * The unlocker should have freed the lock before kicking the
 		 * CPU. So if the lock is still not free, it is a spurious
-		 * wakeup and so the vCPU should wait again after spinning for
-		 * a while.
+		 * wakeup or another vCPU has stolen the lock. The current
+		 * vCPU should spin again.
 		 */
-		pvstat_inc(pvstat_spurious, true);
+		pvstat_inc(pvstat_spurious, READ_ONCE(l->locked));
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Lock is unlocked now; the caller will acquire it without waiting.
-	 * As with pv_wait_node() we rely on the caller to do a load-acquire
-	 * for us.
+	 * The cmpxchg() or xchg() call before coming here provides the
+	 * acquire semantics for locking.
 	 */
+gotlock:
+	return (u32)atomic_read(&lock->val);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -487,7 +569,7 @@ __pv_queued_spin_unlock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u8 locked)
 	 * so we need a barrier to order the read of the node data in
 	 * pv_unhash *after* we've read the lock being _Q_SLOW_VAL.
 	 *
-	 * Matches the cmpxchg() in pv_wait_head() setting _Q_SLOW_VAL.
+	 * Matches the cmpxchg() in pv_wait_head_lock() setting _Q_SLOW_VAL.
 	 */
 	smp_rmb();
 
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists