[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5620971D.8040103@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 08:20:13 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/mpc5xxx: Avoid dereferencing potentially freed
memory
Le 15/10/2015 08:36, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 07:56 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Use 'of_property_read_u32()' instead of 'of_get_property()'+pointer
>> dereference in order to avoid access to potentially freed memory.
>>
>> Use 'of_get_next_parent()' to simplify the while() loop and avoid the
>> need of a temp variable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> ---
>> v2: Use of_property_read_u32 instead of of_get_property+pointer dereference
>> *** Untested ***
> Thanks.
>
> Can someone with an mpc5xxx test this?
>
> cheers
>
Hi,
I don't think it is an issue, but while looking at another similar
patch, I noticed that the proposed patch adds a call to be32_to_cpup()
(within of_property_read_u32).
Apparently, powerPC is a BE architecture, so this call should be a no-op.
Just wanted to point it out, in case of.
Best regards,
CJ
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists