linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 5/5] cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first CPU in related

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <44a5b86d1df41812461630e5a7c5366d276e2855.1444979341.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:41:12 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	skannan@...eaurora.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH V3 5/5] cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first CPU in related_cpus

The sysfs policy directory is postfixed currently with the CPU number
for which the policy was created, which isn't necessarily the first CPU
in related_cpus mask.

To make it more consistent and predictable, lets postfix the policy with
the first cpu in related-cpus mask.

Suggested-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
V2->V3:
- Fix error path where we may try to put an uninitialized kobject.
- Break kobject_init_and_add() to kobject_init() and kobject_add().

 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 4fa2215cc6ec..7c48e7316d91 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1022,7 +1022,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	struct device *dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (WARN_ON(!dev))
 		return NULL;
@@ -1040,13 +1039,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
 	if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&policy->real_cpus, GFP_KERNEL))
 		goto err_free_rcpumask;
 
-	ret = kobject_init_and_add(&policy->kobj, &ktype_cpufreq,
-				   cpufreq_global_kobject, "policy%u", cpu);
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to init policy->kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret);
-		goto err_free_real_cpus;
-	}
-
+	kobject_init(&policy->kobj, &ktype_cpufreq);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->policy_list);
 	init_rwsem(&policy->rwsem);
 	spin_lock_init(&policy->transition_lock);
@@ -1057,8 +1050,6 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
 	policy->cpu = cpu;
 	return policy;
 
-err_free_real_cpus:
-	free_cpumask_var(policy->real_cpus);
 err_free_rcpumask:
 	free_cpumask_var(policy->related_cpus);
 err_free_cpumask:
@@ -1163,6 +1154,16 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
 		cpumask_copy(policy->related_cpus, policy->cpus);
 		/* Remember CPUs present at the policy creation time. */
 		cpumask_and(policy->real_cpus, policy->cpus, cpu_present_mask);
+
+		/* Name and add the kobject */
+		ret = kobject_add(&policy->kobj, cpufreq_global_kobject,
+				  "policy%u",
+				  cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus));
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("%s: failed to add policy->kobj: %d\n", __func__,
+			       ret);
+			goto out_exit_policy;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
-- 
2.4.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/