linux-kernel - Re: futex timeout not working? (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:31:23 +0200
From:	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Stefan Liebler <stli@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: futex timeout not working? (bisected)

On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 12:21:51PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Heiko,
> 
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> >   /* We wait for half a second.  */
> >   ts.tv_nsec += 500000000;
> >   if (ts.tv_nsec >= 1000000000)
> >     {
> >       ++ts.tv_sec;
> >       ts.tv_nsec -= 1000000000;
> >     }
> > 
> >   ret = syscall (__NR_futex, &futex_word, op, expected, ts, NULL, FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY);
> 
> If you actually hand in a pointer to 'ts' then the program works as
> expected even with the commit in question applied.

Yes, sorry about that! I was just about to write that this should have
been &ts on x86. Since x86 seems to pass also structures >8 bytes by
value.

However on s390 it is passed by reference. So even it I change ts to &ts,
it will hang as I described.

So you are saying this works on x86 and it must be some s390 specific bug?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/