[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56205917.7090001@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:55:35 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc: Ma Jun <majun258@...wei.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] Adding core support for wire-MSI bridges
On 2015/10/15 23:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> There seems to be a new class of interrupt controller out there whose
> sole purpose (apart from making everybody's life a nightmare) is to
> turn wired interrupts into MSIs.
>
> Instead of considering that the MSIs allocated to a device are for the
> direct use of that device, we can turn this set of MSIs into a irq
> domain, and use that domain to build a standard irqchip on top of
> that.
Hi Marc,
There's a working to enable Intel VMD storage device, which
has the similar requirement. Basically a PCIe hierarchy is hidden
behind a parent PCIe device, so we need to use the PCIe irqs on parent
to de-multiple PCIe IRQs from hidden PCIe devices. Seems a chance for
consolidation here.
cc Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com> who is the author of
VMD device driver.
Thanks!
Gerry
>
> This requires some (slightly ugly) surgery in both the generic MSI and
> platform MSI layers, but the amount of code is actually relatively
> small (about +150 LoC so far).
>
> On top of that, we add a dummy driver for a such a bridge, hoping that
> this will give enough information to driver authors so that they can
> use this new feature. An even more stupid client driver is provided to
> show the interrupt stack allocation:
>
> dummydev dummy-dev: Probing
> dummydev dummy-dev: Allocated IRQ35
> dummydev dummy-dev: Probing OK
> dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 5 domain msichip_domain_ops
> dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 0 domain msi_domain_ops
> dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 8192 domain its_domain_ops
> dummydev dummy-dev: IRQ35 hwirq 8192 domain gic_irq_domain_ops
>
> While this seems to work, it is far from being perfect:
>
> - This is a prototype: error handling is rubbish, and there could be
> better abstractions to use.
>
> - It relies on not declaring this bridge with IRQCHIP_DECLARE in order
> to prevent the DT layer from allocating interrupts behind our back.
>
> - There is some probe ordering issues between the bridge and the wired
> interrupt device, leading to the use of -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> The last two points could be addressed directly in the OF layer, as
> this is a generic device ordering issue (and people are already
> working on that).
>
> I'd welcome any comment on that approach (though I'm going to make
> myself scarse over the next two weeks).
>
> Marc Zyngier (7):
> platform-msi: Allow MSIs to be allocated in chunks
> platform-msi: Factor out allocation/free of private data
> irqdomain: Make irq_domain_alloc_irqs_recursive available
> genirq/msi: Make the .prepare callback reusable
> genirq/msi: Add msi_domain_populate_irqs
> platform-msi: Allow creation of a MSI-based stacked irq domain
> irqchip: [Example] dummy wired interrupt/MSI bridge driver
>
> drivers/base/platform-msi.c | 185 ++++++++++++++++++++--------
> drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 7 ++
> drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/irqchip/irq-msichip.c | 271 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 3 +
> include/linux/msi.h | 16 +++
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 6 +-
> kernel/irq/msi.c | 47 +++++++-
> 8 files changed, 481 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-msichip.c
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists