linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151016022851.GA9008@amt.cnet>
Date:	Thu, 15 Oct 2015 23:28:52 -0300
From:	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
	Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 01:36:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 06:31:27PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > I am rewriting the interface with ioctls, with commands similar to the
> > syscall interface proposed.
> 
> Which is horrible for other use cases. I really don't see the problem
> with the cgroup stuff.

Can you detail what "horrible" means? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/