linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: clearing pte in clear_soft

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 20:30:05 +0530
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...allels.com,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
	aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@...ba.org
Cc:	criu@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: clearing pte in clear_soft_dirty()

On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 14:07 +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
> As mentioned in the commit 56eecdb912b5 ("mm: Use
> ptep/pmdp_set_numa()
> for updating _PAGE_NUMA bit"), architecture like ppc64 doesn't do
> tlb flush in set_pte/pmd functions.
> 
> So when dealing with existing pte in clear_soft_dirty, the pte must
> be cleared before being modified.

Note that this is true of more than powerpc afaik. There's is a general
rule that we don't "restrict" a PTE access permissions without first
clearing it, due to various races.

> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> CC: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index e2d46adb54b4..c9454ee39b28 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -753,19 +753,20 @@ static inline void clear_soft_dirty(struct
> vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	pte_t ptent = *pte;
>  
>  	if (pte_present(ptent)) {
> +		ptent = ptep_modify_prot_start(vma->vm_mm, addr,
> pte);
>  		ptent = pte_wrprotect(ptent);
>  		ptent = pte_clear_flags(ptent, _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY);
> +		ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte,
> ptent);
>  	} else if (is_swap_pte(ptent)) {
>  		ptent = pte_swp_clear_soft_dirty(ptent);
> +		set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, ptent);
>  	}
> -
> -	set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte, ptent);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void clear_soft_dirty_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  		unsigned long addr, pmd_t *pmdp)
>  {
> -	pmd_t pmd = *pmdp;
> +	pmd_t pmd = pmdp_huge_get_and_clear(vma->vm_mm, addr, pmdp);
>  
>  	pmd = pmd_wrprotect(pmd);
>  	pmd = pmd_clear_flags(pmd, _PAGE_SOFT_DIRTY);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/