[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56211FA7.6020107@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:02:47 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...radead.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices
On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>
> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
> This is one example with a team device:
for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists