linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:02:47 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...radead.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	jmorris@...ei.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: no addrconf for slave devices

On 10/16/15 9:57 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>
> I don't think that enslaved ports should get network layer addresses.
> This is one example with a team device:

for VRF devices we do want the enslaved links to have link local addresses.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/