[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFqxUUF8vDDBVLDEfzuAbej8Vy1HEhHJpkjedihoSGu3Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:33:44 +0200
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci at91: add suspend/resume
On 16 October 2015 at 17:01, Ludovic Desroches
<ludovic.desroches@...el.com> wrote:
> Add suspend and resume PM ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>
I have no problem with this patch, nice and easy.
Although it would be interesting to see how runtime PM would be
supported for this driver and device. What I have in mind is whether
we can take a runtime PM centric approach and thus more or less get
system PM for "free" via the pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume()
helpers. Care to have a look?
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> index 06d0b50..b9751f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,59 @@ static const struct of_device_id sdhci_at91_dt_match[] = {
> {}
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int sdhci_at91_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_at91_priv *priv = pltfm_host->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = sdhci_suspend_host(host);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->gck);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->hclock);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(priv->mainck);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sdhci_at91_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct sdhci_host *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct sdhci_at91_priv *priv = pltfm_host->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->mainck);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't enable mainck\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->hclock);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't enable hclock\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->gck);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "can't enable gck\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return sdhci_resume_host(host);
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(sdhci_at91_dev_pm_ops, sdhci_at91_suspend,
> + sdhci_at91_resume);
> +
> static int sdhci_at91_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct of_device_id *match;
> @@ -178,7 +231,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sdhci_at91_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "sdhci-at91",
> .of_match_table = sdhci_at91_dt_match,
> - .pm = SDHCI_PLTFM_PMOPS,
> + .pm = &sdhci_at91_dev_pm_ops,
> },
> .probe = sdhci_at91_probe,
> .remove = sdhci_at91_remove,
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists