linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/6] block: setup bi_phys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1445097154-18229-2-git-send-email-ming.lei@canonical.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 23:52:29 +0800
From:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Ming Lin <ming.l@....samsung.com>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/6] block: setup bi_phys_segments after splitting

The number of bio->bi_phys_segments is always obtained
during bio splitting, so it is natural to setup it
just after bio splitting, then we can avoid to compute
nr_segment again during merge.

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
---
 block/blk-merge.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
index c4e9c37..22293fd 100644
--- a/block/blk-merge.c
+++ b/block/blk-merge.c
@@ -11,13 +11,16 @@
 
 static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					 struct bio *bio,
-					 struct bio_set *bs)
+					 struct bio_set *bs,
+					 unsigned *nsegs)
 {
 	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
 	int alignment;
 	sector_t tmp;
 	unsigned split_sectors;
 
+	*nsegs = 1;
+
 	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
 	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
 
@@ -51,8 +54,11 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_discard_split(struct request_queue *q,
 
 static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					    struct bio *bio,
-					    struct bio_set *bs)
+					    struct bio_set *bs,
+					    unsigned *nsegs)
 {
+	*nsegs = 1;
+
 	if (!q->limits.max_write_same_sectors)
 		return NULL;
 
@@ -64,7 +70,8 @@ static struct bio *blk_bio_write_same_split(struct request_queue *q,
 
 static struct bio *blk_bio_segment_split(struct request_queue *q,
 					 struct bio *bio,
-					 struct bio_set *bs)
+					 struct bio_set *bs,
+					 unsigned *segs)
 {
 	struct bio_vec bv, bvprv, *bvprvp = NULL;
 	struct bvec_iter iter;
@@ -106,22 +113,30 @@ new_segment:
 		sectors += bv.bv_len >> 9;
 	}
 
+	*segs = nsegs;
 	return NULL;
 split:
+	*segs = nsegs;
 	return bio_split(bio, sectors, GFP_NOIO, bs);
 }
 
 void blk_queue_split(struct request_queue *q, struct bio **bio,
 		     struct bio_set *bs)
 {
-	struct bio *split;
+	struct bio *split, *res;
+	unsigned nsegs;
 
 	if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)
-		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs);
+		split = blk_bio_discard_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
 	else if ((*bio)->bi_rw & REQ_WRITE_SAME)
-		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs);
+		split = blk_bio_write_same_split(q, *bio, bs, &nsegs);
 	else
-		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split);
+		split = blk_bio_segment_split(q, *bio, q->bio_split, &nsegs);
+
+	/* physical segments can be figured out during splitting */
+	res = split ? split : *bio;
+	res->bi_phys_segments = nsegs;
+	bio_set_flag(res, BIO_SEG_VALID);
 
 	if (split) {
 		bio_chain(split, *bio);
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/