[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8737x9nnzk.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 00:12:31 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...n.com>,
<linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: move Additional Sense Codes to separate file
On Tue, Oct 06 2015, Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05 2015, Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com> wrote:
>
>> On 10/05/15 02:26, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>> - {0x041A, "Logical unit not ready, start stop unit command in "
>>> - "progress"},
>>> - {0x041B, "Logical unit not ready, sanitize in progress"},
>>> - {0x041C, "Logical unit not ready, additional power use not yet "
>>> - "granted"},
>>
>> Please convert these multi-line strings into single line string
>> constants such that users can look up these easily with grep.
>
> I can certainly do that, but I'd prefer to do it in a separate patch. I
> really want to keep this as mechanical as possible.
>
>>> +
>>> +SENSE_CODE(0, NULL)
>>
>> The above looks confusing to me. Please leave this out and add { 0,
>> NULL } at the end of the additional[] array instead.
>
> OK, I agree that that would have been cleaner. However, the sentinel
> entry is removed in 2/2 (since we loop using ARRAY_SIZE instead of
> checking for the sentinel). Let me know if you want me to resend the
> 1600 line monster anyway with this addressed.
Should I resend, or can these be picked up as-is? I can easily send a
3/2 making the strings more greppable.
Thanks,
Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists