linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first CPU in related

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20151017042907.GA19018@linux>
Date:	Sat, 17 Oct 2015 09:59:07 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] cpufreq: postfix policy directory with the first
 CPU in related_cpus

On 16-10-15, 12:50, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> In the lines that follow this code we set the
> per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data) to point to the new policy. But if the
> subsequent cpu->get() fails, we goto out_exit_policy. But that label
> doesn't clean up the per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data). So, I think we need
> another label to jump to if ->get() fails

We call cpufreq_policy_free() in that case and that does the cleanup
you are talking about.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/